I *did* ask that question. Your answer made good sense to me–that there would be a difference between how God’s actions have moral value and how ours do. That would follow a fortiori, it seems, if God were in some way the *source* of moral value.

Anyway, thanks for the feedback on the glare. I think we’ve taken care of that now! :-)) By the way, your new Oxford book is on its way from Amazon. I may blog in a friendly way about its various parts. I looked at the TOC and couldn’t resist the purchase! :-))

Cheers,
Rich

Yes, weren’t you the one who asked whether I thought that, since God is free and His actions have moral value, He might freely do something immoral? I’m not sure what I said, that’s a difficult question for my view. Just by the way, I don’t know how you guys read white print on dark background. It’s challenging to fight off the glare! Keep up the good posts! — mike

I think you’re exactly right when you say “what you’re after is the idea that thinking or feeling that p is true is irrelevant to p’s truth.” That *was* what I was after! It just didn’t come out properly. I certainly don’t want to deny that there are facts about Jesus’ thoughts and feelings, and that these could serve to ground the truth of Jesus’ beliefs about what he’s thinking and feeling.

Thanks for your help getting clear about that!